ORQA. More time for care.
Reviewing 20,000 reports in 1–2 days, compared with 3–4 months previously, with human judgement at the centre.
A clearer reporting day.
200 squares · 100 reports each · Human review at every approval
Reports reviewed
Client delivery volume reported by AIHI.
Current review time
Maximum three days reported by AIHI.
Previous review time
Client baseline reported by AIHI.
The problem worth solving.
Reviewing 20,000 sponsorship reports previously took 3–4 months. Teams had to check completeness, inconsistent information, errors and unusual values while coordinating feedback across field offices.
A better way to work.
ORQA combines an AI reporting agent with a full review portal. It detects anomalies, mistakes and outliers, proposes corrections and automates preparation. For example, a record describing a four-year-old child as 200 cm tall is flagged for review rather than silently corrected. Authorised staff review suggestions, provide feedback and decide which reports can be approved. The platform also shows field-office activity and the locations engaging most actively with reporting.
A useful idea.
A working rhythm.
Explore the workflow, review points and connected actions that support real delivery.
Try the tabs and controlsA clearer reporting day.
200 squares · 100 reports each · Human review at every approval
Receive field-office reports
Detect anomalies & prepare suggestions
Staff review, feedback & correction
Authorise reports and track activity
Make the difference
visible.
Review turnaround, report volume, flagged anomalies, accepted and rejected corrections, field-office participation and authorised reports.
- 20,000 reports reviewed in 1–2 days, with a maximum of three days reported
- Earlier visibility of irregularities, errors and outliers
- Field-office activity, engagement and feedback visible in one portal
- Human approval remains central to sensitive reporting